<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.1.3" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments for GraysUnderground.com</title>
	<link>http://www.graysunderground.com</link>
	<description>Gray's Tech Blog</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 00:17:40 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.1.3</generator>

	<item>
		<title>Comment on Make sure you hide your Apache headers!! by Gray</title>
		<link>http://www.graysunderground.com/2008/02/08/make-sure-you-hide-your-apache-headers/#comment-1347</link>
		<author>Gray</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2008 19:56:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.graysunderground.com/2008/02/08/make-sure-you-hide-your-apache-headers/#comment-1347</guid>
					<description>I have to agree and disagree with this. Being that obscurity only helps when your website is the one site the feel they need to hack. I have one server running apache with the tokens open for all the world to see that has been running for 4 years now, never had a single hack attempt. It hosts nothing of real value or anything that is inflammatory that invites attack.

On the other hand I also admin an a high traffic site, that is more prone to attack because of the content that resides there, so in this instance obscurity is your friend. Why? Because even though I keep my OS and software up to date, it does not mean updated software equals safe software. With that being said the latest software has holes just like anything else and if the hacker knows what I'm running it is that much easier for them to penetrate the system as they can look a security issues up on that particular version of apache or OS and see where I'm vulnerable.

So obscurity is your friend, while obscurity does not equal security, it does give you a better chance of avoiding or delaying attacks. And delaying attacks until I can apply a security patch keeps my servers safe.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to agree and disagree with this. Being that obscurity only helps when your website is the one site the feel they need to hack. I have one server running apache with the tokens open for all the world to see that has been running for 4 years now, never had a single hack attempt. It hosts nothing of real value or anything that is inflammatory that invites attack.</p>
<p>On the other hand I also admin an a high traffic site, that is more prone to attack because of the content that resides there, so in this instance obscurity is your friend. Why? Because even though I keep my OS and software up to date, it does not mean updated software equals safe software. With that being said the latest software has holes just like anything else and if the hacker knows what I&#8217;m running it is that much easier for them to penetrate the system as they can look a security issues up on that particular version of apache or OS and see where I&#8217;m vulnerable.</p>
<p>So obscurity is your friend, while obscurity does not equal security, it does give you a better chance of avoiding or delaying attacks. And delaying attacks until I can apply a security patch keeps my servers safe.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Make sure you hide your Apache headers!! by Experienced</title>
		<link>http://www.graysunderground.com/2008/02/08/make-sure-you-hide-your-apache-headers/#comment-1346</link>
		<author>Experienced</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 23:15:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.graysunderground.com/2008/02/08/make-sure-you-hide-your-apache-headers/#comment-1346</guid>
					<description>Sorry. Servertokens have nothing to do with security. If one fails to keep their software and OS current and does not correct unpatched vulnerabilities themselves, then THAT is a security problem. Attempting to hide out of date software will do nothing to prevent hacking attempts/successes.

I have left Apache running on Windows with full servertokens on busy websites for many years, not hacked once. Yes windows, no firewall, wide open on the internet, never hacked. Why? Because I don't fall for all the crap that most people do.

I can do the same on QNX, FreeBSD, Slackware, VxWorks... etc... etc...

I hate to say it as it is so trite, but here it is:
Security through obscurity does not work. Period.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry. Servertokens have nothing to do with security. If one fails to keep their software and OS current and does not correct unpatched vulnerabilities themselves, then THAT is a security problem. Attempting to hide out of date software will do nothing to prevent hacking attempts/successes.</p>
<p>I have left Apache running on Windows with full servertokens on busy websites for many years, not hacked once. Yes windows, no firewall, wide open on the internet, never hacked. Why? Because I don&#8217;t fall for all the crap that most people do.</p>
<p>I can do the same on QNX, FreeBSD, Slackware, VxWorks&#8230; etc&#8230; etc&#8230;</p>
<p>I hate to say it as it is so trite, but here it is:<br />
Security through obscurity does not work. Period.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on AJAX for PHP without the Javascript by Chris</title>
		<link>http://www.graysunderground.com/2007/04/26/ajax-for-php-without-writing-javascript/#comment-1341</link>
		<author>Chris</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2008 02:48:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.graysunderground.com/2007/04/26/ajax-for-php-without-writing-javascript/#comment-1341</guid>
					<description>I like the way these scripts work. Its like having you php run live.. I mean like you click a button and nothing moves it just happens, it would go well with my games! Keep up the good work!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like the way these scripts work. Its like having you php run live.. I mean like you click a button and nothing moves it just happens, it would go well with my games! Keep up the good work!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Google Android SDK Now Available! by Google Android SDK Now Available! &#8212; Google Android</title>
		<link>http://www.graysunderground.com/2007/11/12/google-android-sdk-now-available/#comment-5</link>
		<author>Google Android SDK Now Available! &#8212; Google Android</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2007 19:43:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.graysunderground.com/2007/11/12/google-android-sdk-now-available/#comment-5</guid>
					<description>[...] Read the rest of this great post here [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Read the rest of this great post here [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on AJAX for PHP without the Javascript by Christopher Bess</title>
		<link>http://www.graysunderground.com/2007/04/26/ajax-for-php-without-writing-javascript/#comment-4</link>
		<author>Christopher Bess</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2007 03:19:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.graysunderground.com/2007/04/26/ajax-for-php-without-writing-javascript/#comment-4</guid>
					<description>Sadly its one of the few AJAX for PHP implementations that doesn't spit or abuse the term "javascript-less". It its actually fast and it does ALL the javascript work for you, literally.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sadly its one of the few AJAX for PHP implementations that doesn&#8217;t spit or abuse the term &#8220;javascript-less&#8221;. It its actually fast and it does ALL the javascript work for you, literally.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on A scrollable Div by Gray</title>
		<link>http://www.graysunderground.com/2007/06/16/a-scrollable-div/#comment-2</link>
		<author>Gray</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2007 18:43:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.graysunderground.com/2007/06/16/a-scrollable-div/#comment-2</guid>
					<description>Oh and don't forget to class your div with the same class as in the css class="scrollable".</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh and don&#8217;t forget to class your div with the same class as in the css class=&#8221;scrollable&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
