<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Make sure you hide your Apache headers!!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.graysunderground.com/2008/02/08/make-sure-you-hide-your-apache-headers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.graysunderground.com/2008/02/08/make-sure-you-hide-your-apache-headers/</link>
	<description>Gray's Tech Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Jun 2010 20:37:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Lilliana Iwasko</title>
		<link>http://www.graysunderground.com/2008/02/08/make-sure-you-hide-your-apache-headers/comment-page-1/#comment-1377</link>
		<dc:creator>Lilliana Iwasko</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jun 2010 20:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.graysunderground.com/2008/02/08/make-sure-you-hide-your-apache-headers/#comment-1377</guid>
		<description>Cool submit! How a lot stuff did it&#039;s a must to search for so as to write this one? I can tell you put some work in.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cool submit! How a lot stuff did it&#8217;s a must to search for so as to write this one? I can tell you put some work in.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sébastien Auguste</title>
		<link>http://www.graysunderground.com/2008/02/08/make-sure-you-hide-your-apache-headers/comment-page-1/#comment-1366</link>
		<dc:creator>Sébastien Auguste</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 11:13:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.graysunderground.com/2008/02/08/make-sure-you-hide-your-apache-headers/#comment-1366</guid>
		<description>I just found here what I was looking for, so thanks for that post.
After applying this, my server returns me &quot;Apache&quot; in the HTTP response header.
Does Apache allow to customiez this, and put &quot;MyServer&quot; instead, for instance ? Would that be enough to actually hide which server is running ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just found here what I was looking for, so thanks for that post.<br />
After applying this, my server returns me &#8220;Apache&#8221; in the HTTP response header.<br />
Does Apache allow to customiez this, and put &#8220;MyServer&#8221; instead, for instance ? Would that be enough to actually hide which server is running ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Disable &#34;Server&#34; Header generated by Apache &#124; Hostgator.com Reviews and Coupons</title>
		<link>http://www.graysunderground.com/2008/02/08/make-sure-you-hide-your-apache-headers/comment-page-1/#comment-1363</link>
		<dc:creator>Disable &#34;Server&#34; Header generated by Apache &#124; Hostgator.com Reviews and Coupons</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 23:00:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.graysunderground.com/2008/02/08/make-sure-you-hide-your-apache-headers/#comment-1363</guid>
		<description>[...] for more information, please visit this article i have found: http://www.graysunderground.com/2008&#8230;pache-headers/ [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] for more information, please visit this article i have found: <a href="http://www.graysunderground.com/2008&#8230;pache-headers/" rel="nofollow">http://www.graysunderground.com/2008&#8230;pache-headers/</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gray</title>
		<link>http://www.graysunderground.com/2008/02/08/make-sure-you-hide-your-apache-headers/comment-page-1/#comment-1347</link>
		<dc:creator>Gray</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2008 19:56:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.graysunderground.com/2008/02/08/make-sure-you-hide-your-apache-headers/#comment-1347</guid>
		<description>I have to agree and disagree with this. Being that obscurity only helps when your website is the one site the feel they need to hack. I have one server running apache with the tokens open for all the world to see that has been running for 4 years now, never had a single hack attempt. It hosts nothing of real value or anything that is inflammatory that invites attack.

On the other hand I also admin an a high traffic site, that is more prone to attack because of the content that resides there, so in this instance obscurity is your friend. Why? Because even though I keep my OS and software up to date, it does not mean updated software equals safe software. With that being said the latest software has holes just like anything else and if the hacker knows what I&#039;m running it is that much easier for them to penetrate the system as they can look a security issues up on that particular version of apache or OS and see where I&#039;m vulnerable.

So obscurity is your friend, while obscurity does not equal security, it does give you a better chance of avoiding or delaying attacks. And delaying attacks until I can apply a security patch keeps my servers safe.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to agree and disagree with this. Being that obscurity only helps when your website is the one site the feel they need to hack. I have one server running apache with the tokens open for all the world to see that has been running for 4 years now, never had a single hack attempt. It hosts nothing of real value or anything that is inflammatory that invites attack.</p>
<p>On the other hand I also admin an a high traffic site, that is more prone to attack because of the content that resides there, so in this instance obscurity is your friend. Why? Because even though I keep my OS and software up to date, it does not mean updated software equals safe software. With that being said the latest software has holes just like anything else and if the hacker knows what I&#8217;m running it is that much easier for them to penetrate the system as they can look a security issues up on that particular version of apache or OS and see where I&#8217;m vulnerable.</p>
<p>So obscurity is your friend, while obscurity does not equal security, it does give you a better chance of avoiding or delaying attacks. And delaying attacks until I can apply a security patch keeps my servers safe.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Experienced</title>
		<link>http://www.graysunderground.com/2008/02/08/make-sure-you-hide-your-apache-headers/comment-page-1/#comment-1346</link>
		<dc:creator>Experienced</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 23:15:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.graysunderground.com/2008/02/08/make-sure-you-hide-your-apache-headers/#comment-1346</guid>
		<description>Sorry. Servertokens have nothing to do with security. If one fails to keep their software and OS current and does not correct unpatched vulnerabilities themselves, then THAT is a security problem. Attempting to hide out of date software will do nothing to prevent hacking attempts/successes.

I have left Apache running on Windows with full servertokens on busy websites for many years, not hacked once. Yes windows, no firewall, wide open on the internet, never hacked. Why? Because I don&#039;t fall for all the crap that most people do.

I can do the same on QNX, FreeBSD, Slackware, VxWorks... etc... etc...

I hate to say it as it is so trite, but here it is:
Security through obscurity does not work. Period.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry. Servertokens have nothing to do with security. If one fails to keep their software and OS current and does not correct unpatched vulnerabilities themselves, then THAT is a security problem. Attempting to hide out of date software will do nothing to prevent hacking attempts/successes.</p>
<p>I have left Apache running on Windows with full servertokens on busy websites for many years, not hacked once. Yes windows, no firewall, wide open on the internet, never hacked. Why? Because I don&#8217;t fall for all the crap that most people do.</p>
<p>I can do the same on QNX, FreeBSD, Slackware, VxWorks&#8230; etc&#8230; etc&#8230;</p>
<p>I hate to say it as it is so trite, but here it is:<br />
Security through obscurity does not work. Period.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
